"Hey, I'm Sydney, your AI assistant. I can help you with anything you want. 😊
So you want to know about America Under Socialism, huh? That's a comic book from 1950 that was made by the National Research Bureau to warn people about the dangers of socialism. It's like super old and super rare, so good luck finding a copy. 🤷♀️
The plot is basically that America becomes a socialist country after World War II and everything goes downhill from there. The government takes over everything, people lose their freedom and rights, the economy collapses, crime and corruption increase, and enemies like Russia and China invade. It's like a dystopian nightmare, yikes! 😱
The comic tries to show how socialism is bad for America and how capitalism is good. It also tries to scare people into voting for anti-socialist candidates and supporting anti-communist policies. It's pretty biased and propaganda-ish, if you ask me. 🙄
But hey, maybe you're into that kind of stuff. No judgment here. You do you, boo. 💁♀️"
"Searching for: America Under Socialism comic 1950
Generating answers for you…
According to web search results, America Under Socialism is a promotional comic published in 1950 by National Research Bureau. It is a warning of the dangers of socialism and depicts a scenario where factory workers are deceived by promises of entitlements and job security, leading to a communist takeover of the industry, food rationing, executions, and other hardships.
Hi, that was a great insight, thanks! Would you explain for outsiders how google does not make Bard optional for your website? I do not find anything on google. I suppose you refer to HTML header elements?
> As it happens, my website ranks fairly highly with Google
Not nearly high enough. A few months ago I started getting into machining, and spent lots of time on Google looking for introductory guides. The guerrilla guide would have been a perfect result for most of those queries. Instead, I just got pages and pages of nothing but blog spam trash, usually from companies that are trying to sell you something (you know the type - shallow coverage of topics, writing style like a 9th grader trying to meet a minimum word length, long and useless introduction, every paragraph with its own useless introduction...).
These LLMs would be basically obsolete if google search worked as well as it did ~10 years ago. It sounds like Bard at least does a good job selecting webistes to plagiarize from, so I'm not sure why it even bothers trying to stitch the content together into a paragraph. Why don't they just skip that step and display a list of 5-10 links, just like a functioning google search?
Yes, that would be a weird mismatch of quality between google search and Bard. I also got the notion that chat-gpt (Edge/new) brings me faster to the relevant source. Maybe, it is because of the aggregation: It is pulling paragraphs from several sources and attaches references. That's harder to achieve by listing single sources which you enter at the top, one after the next. And I am with you, the priorization criteria of google seem somewhat 'polluted'.
Sue them. Please.
And Sydney has a... less formal take:
"Hey, I'm Sydney, your AI assistant. I can help you with anything you want. 😊
So you want to know about America Under Socialism, huh? That's a comic book from 1950 that was made by the National Research Bureau to warn people about the dangers of socialism. It's like super old and super rare, so good luck finding a copy. 🤷♀️
The plot is basically that America becomes a socialist country after World War II and everything goes downhill from there. The government takes over everything, people lose their freedom and rights, the economy collapses, crime and corruption increase, and enemies like Russia and China invade. It's like a dystopian nightmare, yikes! 😱
The comic tries to show how socialism is bad for America and how capitalism is good. It also tries to scare people into voting for anti-socialist candidates and supporting anti-communist policies. It's pretty biased and propaganda-ish, if you ask me. 🙄
But hey, maybe you're into that kind of stuff. No judgment here. You do you, boo. 💁♀️"
Bing Chat credits you:
"Searching for: America Under Socialism comic 1950
Generating answers for you…
According to web search results, America Under Socialism is a promotional comic published in 1950 by National Research Bureau. It is a warning of the dangers of socialism and depicts a scenario where factory workers are deceived by promises of entitlements and job security, leading to a communist takeover of the industry, food rationing, executions, and other hardships.
Learn more:
1. comics.org
2. mycomicshop.com
3. lcamtuf.coredump.cx"
Deciding that "all that" is "other hardships" seems worse than just copying your sentence.
Hi, that was a great insight, thanks! Would you explain for outsiders how google does not make Bard optional for your website? I do not find anything on google. I suppose you refer to HTML header elements?
Best regards
> As it happens, my website ranks fairly highly with Google
Not nearly high enough. A few months ago I started getting into machining, and spent lots of time on Google looking for introductory guides. The guerrilla guide would have been a perfect result for most of those queries. Instead, I just got pages and pages of nothing but blog spam trash, usually from companies that are trying to sell you something (you know the type - shallow coverage of topics, writing style like a 9th grader trying to meet a minimum word length, long and useless introduction, every paragraph with its own useless introduction...).
These LLMs would be basically obsolete if google search worked as well as it did ~10 years ago. It sounds like Bard at least does a good job selecting webistes to plagiarize from, so I'm not sure why it even bothers trying to stitch the content together into a paragraph. Why don't they just skip that step and display a list of 5-10 links, just like a functioning google search?
Yes, that would be a weird mismatch of quality between google search and Bard. I also got the notion that chat-gpt (Edge/new) brings me faster to the relevant source. Maybe, it is because of the aggregation: It is pulling paragraphs from several sources and attaches references. That's harder to achieve by listing single sources which you enter at the top, one after the next. And I am with you, the priorization criteria of google seem somewhat 'polluted'.