Against the hydraulic analogy

Let that sink in: the most popular tool for teaching electronics makes the trade harder to learn.

If you ever picked up an introductory book about electronics, you were probably exposed to a teaching aid known as the hydraulic analogy. It is a reimagining of electronic circuits as a series of tubes; in this model, electricity is akin to water, batteries are pumps, and switches behave like valves.

Pssst, kid… want to learn circuit design?

I learned the basics the same way, but I’ve come to detest this approach. I think it held me back for years. To be clear, analogies and simplifications are useful — but they need to hold water, requiring only incremental tweaks as you progress. And from this perspective, the hydraulic analogy springs far too many leaks.

The model is iffy even for inductors and capacitors, but the issues become hard to ignore by the time you’re discussing semiconductors. The components are central to all modern electronics, but there’s no plausible plumber analogy for how they behave. One book tries to explain a junction field-effect transistor (JFET) the following way:

An illustration from “Practical Electronics for Inventors” by Paul Scherz.

Well, hold on to your wrench: in a typical JFET, aren’t the source and drain terminals supposed to be interchangeable? And don’t these transistors allow some gate current to flow when the voltage becomes slightly positive?…

Wikipedia doesn’t stop there; here’s their take on the metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET):

The hydraulic MOSFET. Cc-sa, by Wikipedia user Vanessaezekowitz.

Mother of all manifolds! How do these models account for the “flow-to-pressure” (I_d to V_ds) curve of their namesake electronic components? Well… they don’t. In other words, good luck making sense of amplifiers.

It gets worse; presented without comment is a well-publicized reinvention of a bipolar junction transistor (BJT) as a pull-chain toilet with a bucket instead of a handle:

The flush transistor. Artwork by Giovanni Organtini.

The problem with these models isn’t that they aren’t intuitive: it’s that the analogy is fundamentally incorrect and can’t be fixed by tacking improbable plumbing fixtures on top. Worse, when the illusion falls apart, you can’t just backtrack a bit or add a footnote here and there; the only path forward is to forget it all and start anew.

For a collection of pipe-free articles on electronics, click here. You might enjoy an explanation of currents, voltages, and impedances; a discussion of transistors; a primer on signal amplification; or a deep dive into op-amp dynamics.